Minor Poems of Michael Drayton — Story, Setting & Ideas

(5 User reviews)   940
Drayton, Michael, 1563-1631, Brett, Cyril, 1882-1936 [Editor] Project Gutenberg 2006 Not confirmed
English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 71,441
Reading time 311 min
Text sections 14

Before opening Minor Poems of Michael Drayton — Story, Setting & Ideas, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 71,441 words, 5 hr 11 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 34.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Cyril Brett's 1907 edition of Drayton's minor poems, with chronological table and notes. The collection spans sonnets, odes, elegies, and pastoral pieces, revealing shifts from Petrarchan convention to satirical directness and mythic play.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Drayton were the 'rival poet' to Shakespeare, whether these sonnets were really addressed to a man, or merely to the ideal Platonic beauty; for those who are interested in these points, I subjoin references to the sonnets which touch upon them.[11] From the prentice-work evident in many of the _Amours_, it would seem that certain of them are among Drayton's earliest poems; but others show a craftsman not meanly advanced in his art. Nevertheless, with few exceptions, this first 'bundle of sonnets' consists rather of trials of skill, bubbles of the mind; most of his sonnets which strike the reader as touched or penetrated with genuine passion belong to the editions from 1599 onwards; implying that his love for Anne Goodere, if at all represented in these poems, grew with his years, for the 'love-parting' is first found in the edition of 1619. But for us the question should not be, are these sonnets genuine representations of the personal feeling of the poet? but rather, how far do they arouse or echo in us as individuals the universal passion? There are at least some of Drayton's sonnets which possess a direct, instant, and universal appeal, by reason of their simple force and straightforward ring; and not in virtue of any subtle charm of sound and rhythm, or overmastering splendour of diction or thought. Ornament vanishes, and soberness and simplicity increase, as we proceed in the editions of the sonnets. Drayton's chief attempt in the jewelled or ornamental style appeared in 1595, with the title of _Endimion and Phoebe_, and was, in a sense, an imitation of Marlowe's _Hero and Leander_. _Hero and Leander_ is, as Swinburne says, a shrine of Parian marble, illumined from within by a clear flame of passion; while _Endimion and Phoebe_ is rather a curiously wrought tapestry, such as that in Mortimer's Tower, woven in splendid and harmonious colours, wherein, however, the figures attain no clearness or subtlety of outline, and move in semi-conventional scenery. It is, none the less, graceful and impressive, and of a like musical fluency with other poems of its class, such as _Venus and Adonis_, or _Salmacis and Hermaphrodius_. Parts of it were re-set and spoilt in a 1606 publication of Drayton's, called _The Man in the Moone_.

In 1593 and 1594 Drayton also published his earliest pieces on the mediaeval theme of the 'Falls of the Illustrious'; they were _Peirs Gavesson_ and _Matilda the faire and chaste daughter of the Lord Robert Fitzwater_. Here Drayton followed in the track of Boccaccio, Lydgate, and the _Mirrour for Magistrates_, walking in the way which Chaucer had derided in his _Monkes Tale_: and with only too great fidelity does Drayton adapt himself to the dullnesses of his model: fine rhetoric is not altogether wanting, and there is, of course, the consciousness that these subjects deal with the history of his beloved country, but neither these, nor _Robert, Duke of Normandy_ (1596), nor _Great Cromwell, Earl of Essex_ (1607 and 1609), nor the _Miseries of Margaret_ (1627) can escape the charge of tediousness.[12] _England's Heroical Epistles_ were first published in 1597, and other editions, of 1598, 1599, and 1602, contain new epistles. These are Drayton's first attempt to strike out a new and original vein of English poetry: they are a series of letters, modelled on Ovid's _Heroides_,[13] addressed by various pairs of lovers, famous in English history, to each other, and arranged in chronological order, from Henry II and Rosamond to Lady Jane Grey and Lord Guilford Dudley. They are, in a sense, the most important of Drayton's writings, and they have certainly been the most popular, up to the early nineteenth century. In these poems Drayton foreshadowed, and probably inspired, the smooth style of Fairfax, Waller, and Dryden. The metre, the grammar, and the thought, are all perfectly easy to follow, even though he employs many of the Ovidian 'turns' and 'clenches'. A certain attempt at realization of the different characters is observable, but the poems are fine rhetorical exercises rather than realizations of the dramatic and passionate possibilities of their themes. In 1596, Drayton, as we have seen, published the _Mortimeriados_, a kind of epic, with Mortimer as its hero, of the wars between King Edward II and the Barons.[14] It was written in the seven-line stanza of Chaucer's _Troilus and Cressida_ and Spenser's _Hymns_. On its republication in 1603, with the title of the _Barons' Wars_, the metre was changed to _ottava rima_, and Drayton showed, in an excellent preface, that he fully appreciated the principles and the subtleties of the metrical art. While possessing many fine passages, the _Barons' Wars_ is somewhat dull, lacking much of the poetry of the older version; and does not escape from Drayton's own criticism of Daniel's Chronicle Poems: 'too much historian in verse, ... His rhymes were smooth, his metres well did close, But yet his manner better fitted prose'.[15] The description of Mortimer's Tower in the sixth book recalls the ornate style of _Endimion and Phoebe_, while the fifth book, describing the miseries of King Edward, is the most moving and dramatic. But there is a general lifelessness and lack of movement for which these purple passages barely atone. The cause of the production of so many chronicle poems about this time has been supposed[16] to be the desire of showing the horrors of civil war, at a time when the queen was growing old, and no successor had, as it seemed, been accepted. Also they were a kind of parallel to the Chronicle Play; and Drayton, in any case even if we grant him to have been influenced by the example of Daniel, never needed much incentive to treat a national theme.

About this time, we find Drayton writing for the stage. It seems unnecessary here to discuss whether the writing of plays is evidence of Drayton's poverty, or his versatility;[17] but the fact remains that he had a hand in the production of about twenty. Of these, the only one which certainly survives is _The first part of the true and honorable historie, of the life of Sir John Oldcastle, the good Lord Cobham,_ &c. It is practically impossible to distinguish Drayton's share in this curious play, and it does not, therefore, materially assist the elucidation of the question whether he had any dramatic feeling or skill. It can be safely affirmed that the dramatic instinct was nor uppermost in his mind; he was a Seneca rather than a Euripides: but to deny him all dramatic idea, as does Dr. Whitaker, is too severe. There is decided, if slender, dramatic skill and feeling in certain of the _Nymphals_. Drayton's persons are usually, it must be said, rather figures in a tableau, or series of tableaux; but in the second and seventh _Nymphals_, and occasionally in the tenth, there is real dramatic movement. Closely connected with this question is the consideration of humour, which is wrongly denied to Drayton. Humour is observable first, perhaps, in the _Owle_ (1604); then in the _Ode to his Rival_ (1619); and later in the _Nymphidia_, _Shepheards Sirena_, and _Muses Elyzium_. The second _Nymphal_ shows us the quiet laughter, the humorous twinkle, with which Drayton writes at times. The subject is an [Greek: agôn] or contest between two shepherds for the affections of a nymph called Lirope: Lalus is a vale-bred swain, of refined and elegant manners, skilled, nevertheless, in all manly sports and exercises; Cleon, no less a master in physical prowess, was nurtured by a hind in the mountains; the contrast between their manners is admirably sustained: Cleon is rough, inclined to be rude and scoffing, totally without tact, even where his mistress is concerned. Lalus remembers her upbringing and her tastes; he makes no unnecessary or ostentatious display of wealth; his gifts are simple and charming, while Cleon's are so grotesquely unsuited to a swain, that it is tempting to suppose that Drayton was quietly satirizing Marlowe's _Passionate Shepherd_. Lirope listens gravely to the swains in turn, and makes demure but provoking answers, raising each to the height of hope, and then casting them both down into the depths of despair; finally she refuses both, yet without altogether killing hope. Her first answer is a good specimen of her banter and of Drayton's humour.[18]

On the accession of James I, Drayton hastened to greet the King with a somewhat laboured song _To the Maiestie of King James_; but this poem was apparently considered to be premature: he cried _Vivat Rex_, without having said, _Mortua est eheu Regina_, and accordingly he suffered the penalty of his 'forward pen',[19] and was severely neglected by King and Court. Throughout James's reign a darker and more satirical mood possesses Drayton, intruding at times even into his strenuous recreation-ground, the _Polyolbion_, and manifesting itself more directly in his satires, the _Owle_ (1604), the _Moon-Calfe_ (1627), the _Man in the Moone_ (1606), and his verse-letters and elegies; while his disappointment with the times, the country, and the King, flashes out occasionally even in the Odes, and is heard in his last publication, the _Muses Elizium_ (1630). To counterbalance the disappointment in his hopes from the King, Drayton found a new and life-long friend in Walter Aston, of Tixall, in Staffordshire; this gentleman was created Knight of the Bath by James, and made Drayton one of his esquires. By Aston's 'continual bounty' the poet was able to devote himself almost entirely to more congenial literary work; for, while Meres speaks of the _Polyolbion_ in 1598,[20] and we may easily see that Drayton had the idea of that work at least as early as 1594,[21] yet he cannot have been able to give much time to it till now. Nevertheless, the 'declining and corrupt times' worked on Drayton's mind and grieved and darkened his soul, for we must remember that he was perfectly prosperous then and was not therefore incited to satire by bodily want or distress.

In 1604 he published the _Owle_, a mild satire, under the form of a moral fable of government, reminding the reader a little of the _Parlement of Foules_. _The Man in the Moone_ (1606) is partly a recension of _Endimion and Phoebe_, but is a heterogeneous mass of weakly satire, of no particular merit. The _Moon-Calfe_ (1627) is Drayton's most savage and misanthropic excursion into the region of Satire; in which, though occasionally nobly ironic, he is more usually coarse and blustering, in the style of Marston.[22] In 1605 Drayton brought out his first 'collected poems', from which the _Eclogues_ and the _Owle_ are omitted; and in 1606 he published his _Poemes Lyrick and Pastorall_, _Odes_, _Eglogs_, _The Man in the Moone_. Of these the _Eglogs_ are a recension of the _Shepherd's Garland_ of 1593: we have already spoken of _The Man in the Moone_. The _Odes_ are by far the most important and striking feature of the book. In the preface, Drayton professes to be following Pindar, Anacreon, and Horace, though, as he modestly implies, at a great distance. Under the title of _Odes_ he includes a variety of subjects, and a variety of metres; ranging from an _Ode to his Harp_ or _to his Criticks_, to a _Ballad of Agincourt_, or a poem on the Rose compared with his Mistress. In the edition of 1619 appeared several more Odes, including some of the best; while many of the others underwent careful revision, notably the _Ballad_. 'Sing wee the Rose,' perhaps because of its unintelligibility, and the Ode to his friend John Savage, perhaps because too closely imitated from Horace, were omitted. Drayton was not the first to use the term _Ode_ for a lyrical poem, in English: Soothern in 1584, and Daniel in 1592 had preceded him; but he was the first to give the name popularity in England, and to lift the kind as Ronsard had lifted it in France; and till the time of Cowper no other English poet showed mastery of the short, staccato measure of the Anacreontic as distinct from the Pindaric Ode. In the _Odes_ Drayton shows to the fullest extent his metrical versatility: he touches the Skeltonic metre, the long ten-syllabled line of the _Sacrifice to Apollo_; and ascends from the smooth and melodious rhythms of the _New Year_ through the inspiring harp-tones of the _Virginian Voyage_ to the clangour and swing of the _Ballad of Agincourt_. His grammar is possibly more distorted here than anywhere, but, as Mr. Elton says, 'these are the obstacles of any poet who uses measures of four or six syllables.' His tone throughout is rather that of the harp, as played, perhaps, in Polesworth Hall, than that of any other instrument; but in 1619 Drayton has taken to him the lute of Carew and his compeers. In 1619 the style is lighter, the fancy gayer, more exquisite, more recondite. Most of his few metaphysical conceits are to be found in these later Odes, as in the _Heart_, the _Valentine_, and the _Crier_. In the comparison of the two editions the nobler, if more strained, tone of the earlier is obvious; it is still Elizabethan, in its nobility of ideal and purpose, in its enthusiasm, in its belief and confidence in England and her men; and this even though we catch a glimpse of the Jacobean woe in the _Ode to John Savage_: the 1619 Odes are of a different world; their spirit is lighter, more insouciant in appearance, though perhaps studiedly so; the rhythms are more fantastic, with less of strength and firmness, though with more of grace and superficial beauty; even the very textual alterations, while usually increasing the grace and the music of the lines, remind the reader that something of the old spontaneity and freshness is gone.

In 1607 and 1609, Drayton published two editions of the last and weakest of his mediaeval poems--the _Legend of Great Cromwell_; and for the next few years he produced nothing new, only attending to the publication of certain reprints and new editions. During this time, however, he was working steadily at the _Polyolbion_, helped by the patronage of Aston and of Prince Henry. In 1612-13, Drayton burst upon an indifferent world with the first part of the great poem, containing eighteen songs; the title-page will give the best idea of the contents and plan of the book: 'Poly-Olbion or a Chorographicall Description of the Tracts, Riuers, Mountaines, Forests, and other Parts of this renowned Isle of Great Britaine, With intermixture of the most Remarquable Stories, Antiquities, Wonders, Rarityes, Pleasures, and Commodities of the same: Digested in a Poem by Michael Drayton, Esq. With a Table added, for direction to those occurrences of Story and Antiquities, whereunto the Course of the Volume easily leades not.' &c. On this work Drayton had been engaged for nearly the whole of his poetical career. The learning and research displayed in the poem are extraordinary, almost equalling the erudition of Selden in his Annotations to each Song. The first part was, for various reasons, a drug in the market, and Drayton found great difficulty in securing a publisher for the second part. But during the years from 1613 to 1622, he became acquainted with Drummond of Hawthornden through a common friend, Sir William Alexander of Menstry, afterwards Earl of Stirling. In 1618, Drayton starts a correspondence; and towards the end of the year mentions that he is corresponding also with Andro Hart, bookseller, of Edinburgh. The subject of his letter was probably the publication of the Second Part; which Drayton alludes to in a letter of 1619 thus: 'I have done twelve books more, that is from the eighteenth book, which was Kent, if you note it; all the East part and North to the river Tweed; but it lies by me; for the booksellers and I are in terms; they are a company of base knaves, whom I both scorn and kick at.' Finally, in 1622, Drayton got Marriott, Grismand, and Dewe, of London, to take the work, and it was published with a dedication to Prince Charles, who, after his brother's death, had given Drayton patronage. Drayton's preface to the Second Part is well worth quoting:

'_To any that will read it._ When I first undertook this Poem, or, as some very skilful in this kind have pleased to term it, this Herculean labour, I was by some virtuous friends persuaded, that I should receive much comfort and encouragement therein; and for these reasons; First, that it was a new, clear, way, never before gone by any; then, that it contained all the Delicacies, Delights, and Rarities of this renowned Isle, interwoven with the Histories of the Britons, Saxons, Normans, and the later English: And further that there is scarcely any of the Nobility or Gentry of this land, but that he is in some way or other by his Blood interested therein. But it hath fallen out otherwise; for instead of that comfort, which my noble friends (from the freedom of their spirits) proposed as my due, I have met with barbarous ignorance, and base detraction; such a cloud hath the Devil drawn over the world's judgment, whose opinion is in few years fallen so far below all ballatry, that the lethargy is incurable: nay, some of the Stationers, that had the selling of the First Part of this Poem, because it went not so fast away in the sale, as some of their beastly and abominable trash, (a shame both to our language and nation) have either despitefully left out, or at least carelessly neglected the Epistles to the Readers, and so have cozened the buyers with unperfected books; which these that have undertaken the Second Part, have been forced to amend in the First, for the small number that are yet remaining in their hands. And some of our outlandish, unnatural, English, (I know not how otherwise to express them) stick not to say that there is nothing in this Island worth studying for, and take a great pride to be ignorant in any thing thereof; for these, since they delight in their folly, I wish it may be hereditary from them to their posterity, that their children may be begg'd for fools to the fifth generation, until it may be beyond the memory of man to know that there was ever other of their families: neither can this deter me from going on with Scotland, if means and time do not hinder me, to perform as much as I have promised in my First Song:

Till through the sleepy main, to _Thuly_ I have gone, And seen the Frozen Isles, the cold _Deucalidon_, Amongst whose iron Rocks, grim _Saturn_ yet remains Bound in those gloomy caves with adamantine chains.

And as for those cattle whereof I spake before, _Odi profanum vulgus, et arceo_, of which I account them, be they never so great, and so I leave them. To my friends, and the lovers of my labours, I wish all happiness. _Michael Drayton._'

The _Polyolbion_ as a whole is easy and pleasant to read; and though in some parts it savours too much of a mere catalogue, yet it has many things truly poetical. The best books are perhaps the xiij, xiv, and xv, where he is on his own ground, and therefore naturally at his best. It is interesting to notice how much attention and space he devotes to Wales. He describes not only the 'wonders' but also the fauna and flora of each district; and of the two it would seem that the flowers interested him more. Though he was a keen observer of country sights and sounds (a fact sufficiently attested by the _Nymphidia_ and the _Nymphals_), it is evident that his interest in most things except flowers was rather momentary or conventional than continuous and heart-felt; but of the flowers he loves to talk, whether he weaves us a garland for the Thame's wedding, or gives us the contents of a maund of simples; and his love, if somewhat homely and unimaginative, is apparent enough. But the main inspiration, as it is the main theme, of the _Polyolbion_ is the glory and might and wealth, past, present, and future, of England, her possessions and her folk. Through all this glory, however, we catch the tone of Elizabethan sorrow over the 'Ruines of Time'; grief that all these mighty men and their works will perish and be forgotten, unless the poet makes them live for ever on the lips of men. Drayton's own voluminousness has defeated his purpose, and sunk his poem by its own bulk. Though it is difficult to go so far as Mr. Bullen, and say that the only thing better than a stroll in the _Polyolbion_ is one in a Sussex lane, it is still harder to agree with Canon Beeching, that 'there are few beauties on the road', the beauties are many, though of a quietly rural type, and the road, if long and winding, is of good surface, while its cranks constitute much of its charm. It is doubtless, from the outside, an appalling poem in these days of epitomes and monographs, but it certainly deserves to be rescued from oblivion and read.

Michael Drayton's minor poems, as edited by Cyril Brett in 1907, present a poet who moved restlessly between modes. The collection opens with sonnets that strain against Petrarchan convention—lines such as 'Our bodies to conuerse as oft they did' signal a concern with spiritual connection that recurs across decades. Yet Drayton's voice is never static: the elegy to Master William Jeffreys breaks into self-interruption ('But soft my Muse, and make a little stay'), revealing a poet who treats his own fluency as suspect. Brett's chronological arrangement, supported by a detailed table of Drayton's life and works, allows readers to trace these shifts in register and pace from the 1590s sonnets through the 1627 Nimphidia and the late Muses Elizium.

Sonnets of Separation and Spiritual Sight

The sonnets included from 1594 to 1619 show Drayton repeatedly testing the limits of the form. In one passage, he imagines that 'refined spirits' know each other 'as doe the Angels'—a claim that turns erotic longing into metaphysical communion. The language is deliberately abstract: 'fruition of that endlesse blisse' echoes Neoplatonic discourse, yet the poem undercuts its own elevation by describing the speaker's 'dull and sleepy sounds' and a spirit that 'was deafe.' This oscillation between high doctrine and bodily confusion gives the sonnets a nervous energy. Later sonnets in the 1619 sequence tighten the line, but the habit of self-correction remains. Brett's edition prints the sonnets by their original publication dates, so readers can watch Drayton move from the ornate Ideas Mirrour (1594) to the more compressed and ironic versions that followed.

Satirical Interruptions in the Elegies

The elegy 'To Master William Jeffreys' offers a striking example of Drayton's willingness to break his own frame. He begins by promising news from England, then veers into a complaint about 'a sort of swine' defiling the Muses' springs. The poem's tone shifts abruptly: 'But soft my Muse, and make a little stay, / Surely thou art not rightly in thy way.' Drayton here stages a failure of poetic decorum, admitting that he has lapsed into 'pure Satire.' The passage is valuable for what it reveals about his compositional habits—he treats the elegy as a flexible container for social grievance, self-mockery, and topical reference. The reference to 'our King Iames' and the Pope suggests a political undercurrent, but the poem remains more interested in the poet's own digressive energy than in sustained argument. Brett's notes help place the addressee, but the effect depends on Drayton's abrupt changes in pace.

Pastoral and Mythic Variation in the Later Poems

The volume's later sections—Nimphidia, The Quest of Cynthia, The Shepards Sirena, and The Muses Elizium—show Drayton experimenting with lighter, more playful registers. Nimphidia (1627) is a mock-heroic fairy poem that moves in quick, tripping couplets, a deliberate contrast to the sonnets' gravity. The pastoral pieces employ refrains and song-like structures; 'The Shepards Sirena' uses a repeating line that gives the verse a hypnotic quality. Brett's edition includes variant texts of the Shepherd's Garland songs from 1593, 1605, and 1606, allowing comparison of Drayton's revisions. In the later versions, the diction becomes simpler and the syntax more parallel, suggesting a move toward clarity. The Muses Elizium (1630) returns to mythological allegory but with a stately, processional rhythm. Together, these poems demonstrate Drayton's range: he could be satirical, tender, or mock-heroic, often within the same volume.

Brett's edition is best read not as a unified statement but as a map of Drayton's experiments. The chronological arrangement rewards attention to small changes—a tightened line, a shift from abstract to concrete diction, a sudden turn from praise to complaint. Readers may find it useful to compare the sonnet sequences across years, or to read the elegies alongside the pastorals to see how Drayton adjusted his pace for different audiences. The notes and appendix provide textual variants, but the poems themselves offer the clearest evidence of a poet who never settled into a single voice.

Reading Brett's old edition of Drayton, I kept thinking how his elegies hold grief at arm's length—restrained, almost shy. It reminded me of that quiet volume of sorrow poems we once browsed, where the ache feels less like shouting and more like a hand resting on your shoulder. The World's Best Poetry, Volume 03: Sorrow and Consolation — Inside the Classic lingers the same way, softly, without demanding anything from you.

Evelyn Allen
1 month ago

Isabella Jackson
3 weeks ago

William Roberts
1 month ago

Lucas Rivera
1 month ago

Dylan Williams
2 weeks ago

5
5 out of 5 (5 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Debra Lopez - 1 month ago
    {'rating': 2, 'text': "While Drayton's importance is undeniable, this edition of his 'Minor Poems' may frustrate modern readers. The archaic language and dense allusions make for a challenging read without sufficient guidance. Many poems seem repetitious in theme, and the lack of a modernized or more accessible formatting hinders enjoyment. I'd recommend this only to dedicated academics, not casual poetry lovers."}

  • ...
    Matthew Foster - 1 week ago
    {'rating': 5, 'text': "Michael Drayton's 'Minor Poems' is a treasure trove for lovers of Elizabethan verse. His sonnets, odes, and pastorals are rich with imagery, historical resonance, and lyrical beauty. The edition is well-annotated, offering context that deepens appreciation. Drayton's mastery of form and his unique voice, especially in 'The Ballad of Agincourt,' make this a compelling read. A must-have for any poetry enthusiast."}

  • ...
    Mary Jackson - 1 week ago
    {'rating': 3, 'text': "This collection offers a comprehensive look at Drayton's lesser-known works, showcasing his skill with varied poetic forms. The depth of historical and mythological references requires some effort to fully grasp, but the editors provide useful notes. While some poems feel dated in language, others, like the patriotic odes, still resonate. A decent scholarly choice, though not the easiest intro to Renaissance poetry."}


Reader reflection

Record your reading impressions

A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks