Poems of Henry Vaughan, Silurist, Volume II — Context and Discussion

(2 User reviews)   742
Vaughan, Henry, 1621-1695, Beeching, H. C. (Henry Charles), 1859-1919 [Commentator], Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever), 1866-1954 [Editor] Project Gutenberg 2009 Not confirmed
Poetry Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 73,977
Reading time 322 min
Text sections 14

Before opening Poems of Henry Vaughan, Silurist, Volume II — Context and Discussion, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 73,977 words, 5 hr 22 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 19.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This volume collects Henry Vaughan's secular poems and translations, including 'Olor Iscanus' and Juvenal's Tenth Satire, revealing his early style before his religious turn. The edition includes textual notes on missing letters and emendations.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Newton was pulled down by a stupid land-agent within the memory of man, but a stone has been found built into the wall of a house half-a-mile from the site, bearing the inscription "H^VE, 1689." This may well stand for H[enry and] E[lizabeth] V[aughan]. Newton probably passed to the poet's eldest son Thomas and his wife Frances.[6] Of their descendants, if any, we know nothing. There was a William Vaughan of Llansantffread who, later than 1714, married Mary Games of Tregaer in Llanfrynach. But this was probably a Vaughan not of Newton, but of Scethrog, also in Llansantffread (_cf._ footnote to p. xxv. below.) In 1733 William Vaughan was churchwarden of Llanfrynach. In 1740 William Vaughan of Tregaer was high sheriff of Brecknock. In 1760 Tregaer had passed by purchase to a Mr. Phillips. The registers of Llanfrynach from 1695-1756 are now lost. Lucy Greenleafe and her sister Catharine are quite obscure. One of them may have been the niece who was living with Thomas Vaughan when news came from the country in 1658 of his father's death (MS. Sloane, 1741, f. 89 (b)). Of the second family, Henry became Rector of Penderin in 1684, and vacated the living, probably through death, in 1713. A tablet to his memory hung during the present century in the church at Penderin, but when the church was restored the tablets were taken down and buried under the tiles of the chancel. His wife, a Walbeoffe of Talyllyn, belonged to the same family as the Walbeoffes of Llanhamlach (vol. ii., p. 189, _note_). The eldest girl, Grisill, married Roger Prosser. The Prossers were the younger branch of a Brecknockshire family who had become sadlers and mercers in Brecon. Many of their tombs are in the Priory church, but Theophilus Jones states that by his time they were extinct. Grisill Prosser was married a second time, in 1709, to Morgan Watkins, an attorney, and was buried on August 21, 1737. The second girl, Lucy, married Jenkin Jones of Trebinshwn, a cousin of Colonel Jenkin Jones, the local Parliamentary leader. Her daughter, Denise Jones, died single in 1780, as Theophilus Jones states, and her tombstone in the Priory church records her descent. The third girl, Rachel, married John Turberville, one of the Turbervilles of Llangattock, who claimed kinship with the Elizabethan poet of that name. The following pedigree shows the descendants of the three daughters of Henry Vaughan's second marriage, so far as they can be traced.[7]

Henry Vaughan = 2. Elizabeth Wise. _________________|____________________ | | | 1. Roger =Grisill ...=2. Morgan Lucy=Jenkin Rachel=John Prosser,| Watkins, |Jones, |Turberville Mercer. | Attorney. |of Trebinshwn. |of Llangattock. | | | _______|___ | Richard = Mary----? | | | of Llamwyse | Walter, Elizabeth = Morgan Denise and Glan y | bapt. 1693. bapt. 1686. | Davies, nat. 1688, rhyd, ob. | | mercer, o.s.p. 29 1720. | | ob. 1727. Aug., 1780. | | | | John. _________________|_________________ | | | | | Thomas Morgan, Elizabeth, | bapt. 8 July, bapt. 4 April, | 1720, 1725, | sep. 20 Nov., sep. 6 July, | 1737. 1730. Margaret, o.s.p. 1765.

It will be seen that I can give no evidence of the existence of any living descendants of Henry Vaughan.

Henry's grandfather, Thomas Vaughan, a younger son of Charles Vaughan of Tretower, seems to have come into the possession of Newton through his marriage with an heiress of the family of Gwillims or Williams. Newton, or in Welsh Trenewydd, is a farm of about 200 acres in the manor or lordship, and near the village of Scethrog, both being in the parish of Llansantffread and hundred of Penkelley. Williams is a common name in Breconshire, and I cannot trace the descent of Thomas Vaughan's wife. In the sixteenth century Newton belonged to a family who finally settled on the name of Howel, ap Howell or Powell.[8] The last of these is described on his tombstone in Llansantffread Church as "David Morgan David Howel, who married ... William of Llanhamoloch: and they had issue one daughter called Denys. He died 2nd June, 1598." Perhaps Newton passed in some way from David Morgan David Howel to his wife's family, and so to Thomas Vaughan, who married Denise Gwillims. Theophilus Jones (ii. 538) records that at a later date other Williams's, also apparently connected with Llanhamlach, were succeeded by other Vaughans at Scethrog, hard by Newton. His account is that David Williams, youngest brother of Sir Thomas Williams of Eltham, married a daughter of John Walbeoffe of Llanhamlach (_cf._ pedigree in vol. ii., p. 189, _note_), and bought Scethrog. Their son Charles died without issue, and the property passed to his wife Mary (Anne in Harl. MS., 2289, t. 39; _cf._ vol. ii., p. 204, _note_), the daughter of Morgan John of Wenallt.... She afterwards married Hugh Powell, clerk, parson of Llansanffread and precentor of St. David's, and her daughter Margaret married Charles Vaughan, son to Vaughan Morgan of Tretower.[9]

A trace of Thomas Vaughan is probably preserved in a window-head from the old church of Llansantffread, now destroyed, which has the inscription:--

1626. E. G. T. V. W. T. W. F. I. [bold reversed 'D'].

T. V. may stand for T[homas] V[aughan].[10]

Of Henry Vaughan, the poet's father, very little is known. His name appears in a list of Breconshire magistrates for 1620. And we learn from Thomas Vaughan's diary in Sloane MS. 1741, f. 89 (b), that he died in August 1658.

The only additional definite fact which I can here record of the poet himself is that in 1691 he entered a caveat against any institution to the vicarage of Llandevalley, he claiming the next presentation under a grant from William Winter, Esq.[11] Mr. Rye has shown that the specimen of handwriting facsimiled by Dr. Grosart in his edition of Henry Vaughan's _Works_ cannot possibly be the poet's. The signatures, however, on the margin of a copy of _Olor Iscanus_, once in the library of Lady Isham, might be genuine.

(b) VAUGHAN AND JESUS COLLEGE, OXFORD.

Anthony a Wood's statement as to Vaughan's residence at Jesus College, Oxford, has been generally accepted, but I venture to doubt it on the following grounds:--

(1) Vaughan's name does not occur in the University Matriculation Register, although his brother Thomas Vaughan is duly entered as matriculating from Jesus on 14th December, 1638. The only College records which help us are the Battel-books for 1638 and 1640. That for 1639 is unfortunately missing. The Rev. Llewellyn Thomas kindly informs me that he can only trace one undergraduate Vaughan in the two books in question. The Christian name is not given, but I think that we must assume it to be Thomas.

(2) Vaughan does not describe himself on any title-page as of Jesus College; nor does he ever speak of himself as an Oxford man. This omission is the more noticeable as he would naturally have done so in the lines _Ad Posteros_ (vol. ii., p. 51), and might well have done so in those _On Sir Thomas Bodley's Library, the Author being then in Oxford_ (vol. ii., p. 197).

(3) Anthony a Wood cannot be depended on. He describes Thomas Carew, for instance, as of C.C.C., whereas he was a most certainly of Merton. And there was another Henry Vaughan of Jesus, who may have been confused with the poet. This Henry Vaughan, a son of John Vaughan of Cathlin, Merionethshire, matriculated at Oriel on July 4, 1634. He afterwards became a Scholar and Fellow of Jesus, taking his B.A. in 1637 and his M.A. in 1639. In 1643 he became vicar of Penteg, co. Monmouth, and died at Abergavenny in 1661. (Wood, _Ath. Oxon._, iii. 531; Foster, _Alumni Oxon._)

(4) The only confirmation of Anthony a Wood's statement is the poem (vol. ii., p. 289) taken by Dr. Grosart from the _Eucharistica Oxoniensia_ (1641), and signed "H. Vaughan, Jes. Col." If I am right, this may be by Vaughan's namesake. He has indeed another poem in that volume signed "Hen. Vaugh., Jes. Soc." but that is in Latin, and it is not unexampled for one man to contribute more than one poem, especially in different tongues, to such collections. Or it may be by Herbert Vaughan, who was a Gentleman-commoner of the College in 1641, and has, with Henry Vaughan the Fellow, verses in the [Greek: proteleia] _Anglo Batava_ of the same year.

(c) VAUGHAN IN THE CIVIL WAR.

There are several passages which make it probable that Vaughan, like his brother Thomas, bore arms on the King's side in the Civil War. The most important is in the poem _To Mr. Ridsley_ (vol. ii., p. 83), where he speaks of the time

"when this juggling fate Of soldiery first seiz'd me."

In the same poem he mentions

"that day, when we Left craggy Biston and the fatal Dee."

"Craggy Biston" is clearly Beeston Castle, one of the outlying defences of Chester, situated on a steep rock not very far east of the Dee. This castle was besieged on several occasions during the Civil War, especially during the campaign of 1645, when Chester was also besieged by the Parliamentarians.[12] Between Beeston and the Dee was fought, on September 24, 1645, the battle of Rowton Heath, after which Charles the First, who had hoped to raise the siege of Chester, was obliged to retreat to Denbigh.[13] The following lines from Vaughan's _Elegy on Mr. R. W._ (vol. ii., p. 79), who fell in that battle, seem to have been written by an eye-witness:

"O that day When like the fathers in the fire and cloud I miss'd thy face! I might in ev'ry crowd See arms like thine, and men advance, but none So near to lightning mov'd, nor so fell on. Have you observ'd how soon the nimble eye Brings th' object to conceit, and doth so vie Performance with the soul, that you would swear The act and apprehension both lodg'd there? Just so mov'd he: like shot his active hand Drew blood, ere well the foe could understand. But here I lost him."

This appears to me pretty conclusive evidence; against it, however, must be set the passage on the Civil War in the autobiographical poem _Ad Posteros_ (vol. ii., p. 51).

Vixi, divisos cum fregerat haeresis Anglos Inter Tysiphonas presbyteri et populi. His primum miseris per amoena furentibus arva Prostravit sanctam vilis avena rosam. Turbarunt fontes, et fusis pax perit undis, Moestaque coelestes obruit umbra dies. Duret ut integritas tamen, et pia gloria, partem Me nullam in tanta strage fuisse, scias; Credidimus nempe insonti vocem esse cruori, Et vires quae post funera flere docent. Hinc castae, fidaeque pati me more parentis Commonui, et lachrimis fata levare meis; Hinc nusquam horrendis violavi sacra procellis, Nec mihi mens unquam, nec manus atra fuit.

The natural interpretation of this certainly is that Vaughan took no share in the disturbances of his time, except to grieve over them in retirement. Yet, in the first place, the lines may have been written before he took up arms in 1645, and, in the second, they may only mean that he had no share in _bringing about_ the troubles of England, or in shedding _innocent_ blood. Similarly when elsewhere, as in _Abel's Blood_ (vol. i. p. 254), and in the prayer to be quoted below, he expresses horror of blood-guiltiness, this need not necessarily be taken as extending to the man who fights in a righteous cause.

Miss Morgan, I may add, suggests that Vaughan was at Rowton Heath, not as a combatant, but as a physician. The description which he gives of the battle reads like that of a man who saw it from some commanding point of view, but was not himself engaged. I think it not improbable that Vaughan was one of the garrison of Beeston Castle, which is described to me as "a sort of grand stand for the battle-field." Beeston Castle was invested by the Parliamentarians in the course of September 1645. On the approach of Charles the troops were drawn off on 19th September to Chester.[14] Charles no doubt took the opportunity to strengthen the garrison. After Rowton Heath Beeston Castle was again besieged, and on November 16th it surrendered. The garrison were allowed to march across the Dee to Denbigh. I think that this winter ride from the fallen fortress is the one described by Vaughan in the poem to Mr. Ridsley. It is the more probable that Vaughan took part in this campaign of 1645, in that Charles's force was largely recruited from Wales. After the battle of Naseby on June 14th, the King had marched through Wales, collecting such levies as he could. He was in Brecon on August 5th.[15] It is quite possible that Vaughan, whose kinsman Sir William Vaughan was in command of a brigade, volunteered on this occasion. From Brecon Charles marched through Radnorshire, Shropshire, Staffordshire, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Yorkshire, and so to Oxford. In September he set out again, and after some delay at Hereford and Raglan, finally made for Chester.

It is just conceivable that it is to some occasion in this campaign that Vaughan refers when he calls Dr. Powell his "fellow-prisoner" (vol. ii., p. 178). The poet may even have been the Captain Vaughan whose name appears in the official list of prisoners taken at Rowton Heath.[16] Powell's name is not there, but then the list does not profess to be complete. But on the whole I think that Vaughan and Powell were only fellow-prisoners in the Platonic sense of imprisonment in the flesh, and even if a literal imprisonment is intended, it may have been due to some act of persecution which Vaughan had to suffer as a Royalist at a later date. There is in _The Mount of Olives_ (1652) a _Prayer in Adversity and Troubles occasioned by our Enemies_ (Grosart, vol. iii., p. 75), which, if it is to be taken--I think it is not--as autobiographical, seems to show that, at least for a time, he lost his estate. The prayer runs: "Thou seest, O God, how furious and implacable mine enemies are: they have not only robbed me of that portion and provision which Thou hast graciously given me, but they have also washed their hands in the blood of my friends, my dearest and nearest relations. I know, O God, and I am daily taught by that disciple whom Thou didst love, that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. Keep me, therefore, O my God, from the guilt of blood, and suffer me not to stain my soul with the thoughts of recompense and vengeance, which is a branch of Thy great prerogative, and belongs wholly unto Thee. Though they persecute me unto death, and pant after the very dust upon the heads of Thy poor, though they have taken the bread out of Thy children's mouth, and have made me a desolation; yet, Lord, give me Thy grace, and such a measure of charity as may fully forgive them."

It may have been during some such time of trouble, or imprisonment, if imprisonment there was, that Vaughan's wife lived with Thomas Vaughan, as will be seen below, in London.

It has not been thought necessary to reprint in this edition of Henry Vaughan's poems the scanty English and Latin verses of his brother, Thomas Vaughan. They may be found, together with verses by Virgil and Campion ascribed to him, in vol. ii. of Dr. Grosart's _Fuller Worthies_ edition. But some account of so curious a person will not be out of place.

As for his brother, our chief authority is Anthony a Wood (_Ath. Oxon._, iii. 722), who says that he was the son of Thomas Vaughan of Llansantffread,[17] that he was born in 1621, educated under Matthew Herbert and at Jesus College, Oxford, of which he became Fellow, took orders and received [in 1640] the living of Llansanffread from his kinsman, Sir George Vaughan [of Fallerstone, Wilts]. He lost his living in the unquiet times of the Civil War, retired to Oxford, and became an eminent chemist, afterwards moving to London, where he worked under the patronage of Sir Robert Murray. He was a great admirer of Cornelius Agrippa, "a great chymist, a noted son of the fire, an experimental philosopher, a zealous brother of the Rosicrucian fraternity ... neither papist nor sectary, but a true resolute protestant in the best sense of the Church of England." In the great plague he fled with Murray from London to Oxford, and thence went to the house of Samuel Kem at Albury, where he died on February 27, 1665/6, of mercury accidentally getting into his nose while he was operating. He was buried at Albury on March 1st. Writing in 1673, Anthony a Wood gives a list of his alchemical and mystical treatises published between 1650 and 1655. Of these he had received a list from Olor Iscanus (Henry Vaughan). They all bear the name of Eugenius Philalethes, except the _Aula Lucis_ (1652), which was issued as by S. N., _i.e._ [Thoma]S [Vaugha]N. Some of these pamphlets contain Vaughan's share of a vigorous and scurrilous controversy with Henry More, the Platonist. Anthony a Wood distinguishes from Vaughan another Eugenius Philalethes, author of the _Brief Natural History_ (1669), also one Eirenaeus Philalethes, author of _Ripley Redivivus_ and other works, and Eirenaeus Philoponos Philalethes, author of _The Marrow of Alchemy_ (1654-5).[18]

A few facts, from well-known sources, may be added to Anthony a Wood's account. The University Registers show that "Thos. Vaughan, son of Thomas of Llansanfraid, co. Brecon, pleb., matriculated from Jesus College on 14 Dec, 1638, aged 16." He took his B.A. on 18 Feb., 1641/2, but does not appear to have taken his M.A., though he became Fellow of his College (Foster, _Alumni Oxon._). John Walker (_Sufferings of the Clergy_ (1714), p. 389) states that he was ejected from his living on the charges of "drunkenness, immorality, and bearing arms for the King."[19] This must have been in 1649, under the Act for the Propagation of the Gospel in Wales. There exists a letter from Thomas Vaughan to a friend in London, dated from "Newtown, Ash Wednesday, 1653;"[20] and it appears from Jones' _History of Brecknockshire_ (ii., 542), that at one time he lived with his brother Henry there. The allusions to Henry More, to Murray, and to the Isis and Thames seem to show that he is the Daphnis of his brother's _Eclogue_ (vol. ii., p. 278). No trace of his death or burial can however be now found at Albury. Mr. Gordon Goodwin points out to me that Dr. Samuel Kem was a somewhat notorious character (_Dict. Nat. Biog._, s.v. _Kem_): perhaps this friendship, together with the personal confession quoted below, throws light on the charges which lost Vaughan his living. On the other hand Anthony a Wood speaks well of him, and the tone of his writings bears out this more kindly judgment, at any rate so far as his later years are concerned.

What has been said fairly well exhausted the available information on Thomas Vaughan until a few years ago, when Mr. A. E. Waite discovered in Sloane MS. 1741 a valuable manuscript of his, containing amongst other things a number of autobiographical memoranda. He printed some extracts from this in the preface to an edition of some of _The Magical Writings of Thomas Vaughan_ (Redway, 1888), and has been kind enough to furnish me with a reference to the MS. itself, which I have carefully examined. It bears the title _Aqua Vitae non Vitis_, and the inscription "Ex libris Thomas et Rebecca Vaughan, 1651, Sept. 28. Quos Deus coniunxit quis separabit?" The contents are partly personal jottings and records of dreams, partly alchemical formulae. They appear to cover the period 1658-1662. We learn from them the following facts:--Vaughan was married on September 28, 1651, to a lady named Rebecca (f. 106 (b)). With her and his "Sister Vaughan" he lived and studied alchemy at the Pinner of Wakefield.[21] He had previously lodged at Mr. Coalman's in Holborn (f. 104 (b)). His wife died on Saturday, April 17, 1658, and was buried at Mappersall, in Bedfordshire (f. 106 (b)).[22] In 1658 his father and his brother W. were both dead, and he mentions the news of his father's death coming to his niece in a letter from the country (f. 89 (b)). On April 9, 1659, he saw his brother H. in a dream. On 16 July, 1658, he was living at Wapping (f. 103 (b)), and at an earlier period at Paddington. There is an inventory of his wife's goods left at Mrs. Highgate's, and mention of a Mr. Highgate and a Sir John Underhill (f. 107). He names his cousin, Mr. J. Walbeoffe, with whom he had some money transactions (f. 18), and speaks of "a certain person with whom I had in former times revelled away my years in drinking" (f. 103). Perhaps this also was John Walbeoffe, on whom _see_ vol. ii., p. 189, _note_. The alchemical formulae and receipts are interesting. In one place (f. 12) Vaughan announces the discovery of the "Extract of Oil of Halcaly," which he had previously found in his wife's days and had lost again. This he calls "the greatest joy I can ever have in this world after her death." He seems to have regarded it as the key to an universal solvent. Nearly every receipt is followed by his and his wife's initials in the form T. R. V. or T. ^V. R., and by some expression of devotion to her or of religious piety.

Henry Vaughan's second volume of poems presents a poet in transition, still working within the conventions of Cavalier verse while already reaching toward the metaphysical concerns that would define his later work. The collection opens with love poems to Amoret and a translation of Juvenal's Tenth Satire, then moves through elegies, commendatory verses, and translations from Casimir. The editorial apparatus—including a transcriber's note about a missing initial letter in 'In Etesiam Lachrymantem' and an added 'y' in the Boethius translation—signals the textual difficulties that have attended Vaughan's work. Readers encounter a poet who addresses friends, patrons, and the river Isca, mixing personal grief with public praise.

Love and Loss in the Amoret Poems

The sequence of poems addressed to Amoret forms the emotional core of the early section. In 'To Amoret. Walking in a Starry Evening,' the speaker compares his beloved to the stars, while 'To Amoret Gone from him' dwells on absence. The poem 'To Amoret, of the Difference 'twixt him and other Lovers, and what True Love is' attempts to define a love that transcends mere passion. These poems are conventional in their Petrarchan imagery but show Vaughan experimenting with stanza forms and rhetorical structures. The tone shifts in 'An Elegy' and 'A Rhapsodis,' where personal loss intrudes upon the pastoral setting. The Amoret poems are best read as a group, tracing a movement from idealized courtship to the realities of separation and mortality.

Translation as Transformation: Juvenal and Casimir

Vaughan's translations occupy a significant portion of the volume. His version of Juvenal's Tenth Satire—the famous 'Vanity of Human Wishes'—renders the Latin into vigorous English couplets, adapting the Roman satirist's attack on ambition and power for a seventeenth-century audience. More striking are the translations from the Polish poet Mathias Casimir Sarbiewski, whose neo-Latin poems Vaughan transforms into English lyrics. In 'The Praise of a Religious Life,' Vaughan answers Horace's 'Beatus ille' by arguing that true blessedness belongs not to the farmer but to the saint. The Casimir translations show Vaughan already drawn to themes of spiritual withdrawal and divine love, anticipating his later religious poetry. The editorial note about a missing 'y' in the Boethius translation reminds us that these texts have survived imperfectly.

Elegy and Commendation: The Social Poet

Several poems in this volume are occasional, written for specific friends and events. 'An Elegy on the Death of Mr. R. W., Slain in the late Unfortunate Differences at Routon Heath' memorializes a friend killed in the Civil War, while 'An Elegy on the Death of Mr. R. Hall, Slain at Pontefract' continues this thread of wartime loss. The commendatory verses—including those by T. Powell and I. Rowlandson—place Vaughan within a network of Royalist and Anglican writers. 'Upon Mr. Fletcher's Plays, Published 1647' and 'Upon the Poems and Plays of the Ever-Memorable Mr. William Cartwright' show Vaughan engaging with contemporary drama. These poems reveal a poet deeply embedded in literary circles, using verse to forge and maintain alliances. The 'Olor Iscanus' section, with its address to the river Isca, grounds this social world in the landscape of South Wales.

This edition, prepared by E. K. Chambers with an introduction by Canon Beeching, provides the textual foundation for understanding Vaughan's development as a poet. Readers interested in the shift from secular to sacred verse will find in these early poems the technical skill and thematic preoccupations that Vaughan would later bring to 'Silex Scintillans.' The volume rewards attention to its textual cruces and to the ways Vaughan adapts his sources, whether classical, neo-Latin, or contemporary.

I found myself returning to Vaughan’s early verses, those loose translations of Juvenal, and thinking how odd it is that we only meet a poet after they’ve already turned. Then I remembered a little volume from 1922, full of voices still finding theirs, American Poetry, 1922: A Miscellany — Edition Insights, and felt the same quiet ache—the ghost of what was almost written.

Isaac Hernandez
1 month ago

Dylan Johnson
1 month ago

4
4 out of 5 (2 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Bradley Greene - 1 month ago
    {'review_type': 'neutral', 'text': "This collection offers substantial work, including 'The Night' and other religious poems, but some pieces are dense and require patience. The mature style is evident, yet occasional unevenness in quality is noticeable. Still, a valuable addition to any poetry library."}

  • ...
    Emily Price - 1 month ago
    {'review_type': 'positive', 'text': "A sublime second volume of Vaughan's poetry, filled with spiritual depth and natural imagery. The verses are both meditative and uplifting, showcasing a unique blend of mystical insight and lyrical beauty. Essential for readers of metaphysical poetry."}

  • ...
    Tina Williams - 3 weeks ago
    {'review_type': 'negative', 'text': 'While there are individual masterpieces, much of this volume feels repetitive and overlong. The religious fervor can become tedious, and the language sometimes feels strained. For modern readers, it may require a lot of effort to appreciate.'}


Reader reflection

Before you leave, reflect on the book

Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks